Read page 2 as text
NorthStar Implant Dentistry, P.C. | Consent for a Patient-Specific / Subperiosteal Implant | Rev. 09/2026
Page 2 of 5
© 2026 NorthStar Implant Dentistry, P.C. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary intellectual property; reproduction, distribution or use outside the practice requires express written permission.
CONSENT FOR A PATIENT-SPECIFIC / SUBPERIOSTEAL IMPLANT
Patient: ______________________________
•
How strong the evidence is. The published studies are small, are mostly case series without a comparison group, and include no randomized
trials. Reviewers have rated the overall certainty of this evidence as very low. Roughly one study in five reports results beyond three years, and
about one in ten beyond five years.
•
What those studies report. In the short and medium term, most of these implants stay in place — reported survival is roughly 70% to 100%,
with an average follow-up of under two years in the largest review. Complications of the gum over the framework are common: part of the
framework becoming exposed through the gum has been reported in about 1 in 4 patients overall, and in some series in as many as 2 out of 3.
Persistent soft-tissue infection was reported in about 1 in 20.
•
What this means for me. My surgeon cannot tell me how long this device will last, cannot promise it will not become exposed or infected,
and cannot rely on long-term studies to predict my result. I am accepting that uncertainty as part of choosing this treatment.
Initial to confirm this was explained to you:
I understand that this is a custom device with limited long-term evidence, that the published studies are small and short, and that
the rate of the gum opening over the framework is substantial.
I understand that no one has told me how many years this device will last, and that no promise or guarantee about its lifespan has
been made to me.
I understand the regulatory status checked in Section 1, including — if it applies to my device — that a custom device is exempt from
the FDA premarket review that mass-produced devices go through.
4. RISKS OF THE SURGERY
Placing this device requires lifting the gum away from the bone over a large area, which makes the surgery longer and the recovery heavier than
for an ordinary implant. No surgery is risk-free, and this list cannot include every possible complication.
•
Common, and usually temporary: significant pain, swelling and bruising of the face and neck, often for a week or more; bleeding and oozing;
stiff jaw and limited opening; sore throat; difficulty eating and speaking for several weeks; numbness of the lip or cheek for hours to days.
•
Less common: infection needing antibiotics, drainage or a second procedure; the wound opening along the incision line; slow healing;
hematoma; damage to the lips, cheeks or tongue; jaw joint pain; scarring; allergic or adverse reaction to a medicine or material, including —
rarely — titanium sensitivity.
•
Uncommon, but serious: nerve injury causing numbness, tingling, burning or pain of the lip, chin, cheek, side of the nose, gums or tongue,
and/or a change in taste. Because the framework is seated over a wide area of bone and may pass close to the mental, inferior alveolar or
infraorbital nerves, this risk is higher than for a single ordinary implant. It usually improves, but it can be permanent; an opening into the
sinus or nose; sinus infection; fracture of a thin, atrophic jaw; infection spreading into the face or neck; heavy bleeding.
•
Rare: medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), more likely with bone-strengthening or anti-cancer drugs or previous radiation
to the jaws; permanent change in facial appearance; life-threatening complications.
5. RISKS SPECIFIC TO A CUSTOM SUBPERIOSTEAL IMPLANT
•
Framework exposure — the most common problem. The gum over the framework can thin, shrink or open, leaving part of the metal visible or
palpable in the mouth. Sometimes this is stable and simply watched; sometimes it needs a gum graft to cover it; and sometimes it leads to
ongoing infection and to removal of the device.
•
Infection travels along the whole device. Because the framework is a single connected structure resting on bone, an infection at one point can
spread along it. Unlike a single failing implant, this often cannot be treated by removing one small part — treatment usually means removing the
entire framework.
•
The device may not fit at surgery. The framework is built from a CT scan taken before surgery. Scan distortion, movement, metal artifact,
changes in the bone between the scan and the operation, or manufacturing tolerance can mean the framework does not seat correctly. If that
happens, my surgeon may have to adjust it, re-scan and re-order a new one, place a different type of implant, or stop and close, leaving me
without the planned treatment that day. A second custom device means a new scan, new fabrication, new surgery and, usually, an additional
fee that may not be refundable.
•
Delay between scan and surgery. Teeth that are extracted, bone that resorbs, or an infection that develops while the device is being made can
change my anatomy enough that the framework no longer fits.
•
Hardware problems. Fixation screws can loosen, break or be lost; an arm of the framework can fracture; the posts that come through the gum
can loosen or fracture. Repairing a custom framework in the mouth is limited, and some failures can only be solved by replacing the whole
device.
•
It does not integrate the way an ordinary implant does. The framework rests on the bone rather than inside it, so it is held mainly by screws
and by the soft tissue seal around the posts. That seal is the known weak point of this design, and keeping it clean is critical.
•
Removal is a bigger operation. If the device must be removed, that is a larger surgery than removing an ordinary implant. Bone may be lost or
reshaped in the process, healing takes longer, and my options afterwards may be fewer and more difficult than the ones I have today —
including the possibility that only a removable denture, on a poorer ridge, remains.
•
Soft tissue quality matters. Thin or mobile gum over the framework raises the risk of exposure, so additional soft tissue grafting may be
recommended at the time of surgery or later, at additional cost.
•
The bridge on top. The prosthesis attached to the device carries the same issues as any full-arch bridge: daily cleaning under it, food and air
passing beneath it, speech changes, chipping and wear, screw loosening, professional removal and cleaning, and eventual replacement at
additional cost. Grinding and clenching increase all of these, and a night guard is usually required.